5% internet users looking for property to buy

Talk about Online Real Estate…

Five percent of Internet users went online yesterday to find a place to live, according to Pew.

By Lisa Phillips - Senior Analyst

Call it virtual voyeurism: By August 2006, 51% of all Internet users had taken a virtual tour of a piece of real estate, according to the latest release from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, up from 45% in November 2004. Likewise, 39% of adult Internet users went online to look for information about a place to live in 2006, compared with 34% in 2004 and just 27% in 2000. Pew surveyed 2,928 adults in August; 1,990 were Internet users and 972 were asked the “place to live” question.

Age is a better predictor for house hunters than is connection speed or the number of years of online experience, Pew found. More than half (51%) of the youngest adult Internet users, ages 18 to 29, have looked for new digs online, compared to 43% of users ages 30 to 49 and 27% of users ages 50 to 64. Income does not dictate who searches for housing online, Pew found. The percentages are roughly the same: 43% of people who make less than $30,000 a year looked for real estate online, 42% of earners who make between $30,000 and $49,000 a year and 45% of those who make more than $75,000 a year. Still, just 32% of people who make between $50,000 and $74,999 a year have ever searched for homes online. It may be that they are already happy where they are.

Online experience has a lot to do with who searches real estate ads online. Only 23% of people with three years or less time logged online were house-hunting, compared with 30% of Internet users who had been online four to five years and 45% of people with more than six years of Internet experience. Broadband connections, as usual, made a difference too. Just 30% of people with dial-up connections used the Web for housing information vs. 45% of people with broadband connections.

Realtors have taken notice of the increasing online activity too. Nearly 45% of real estate ad spending, about $3.4 billion, went online in 2006, according to the Kelsey Group. The study, reported by MediaPost, found 7.3% of sellers would place an ad online first and 27% of buyers would go online to look for real estate classifieds.

Traditional media gives way to conversation-based web marketing channels

Corporate Web sites may not push out awesome viewership statistics compared to many media sites, but the data coming out of recent research is pointing to direct communications with online audiences providing multiples more impact on their bottom lines than media-based advertising (here).

Online media companies are likely to have a great year in 2007 but the looming question is how much longer marketers are going to care about Web site advertising in an era when direct conversations between sellers and buyers are pushing traditional media to the sidelines.

The media isn’t dead yet, but if it can’t shoehorn its way into these conversations more effectively it better start thinking about it’s retirement plan.

The environment for online media is looking pretty robust, these days: forecasts for 2007 online ad revenues are looking great and new forms of electronic media production are flourishing everywhere. Brand advertisers are also beginning to embrace the Web more enthusiastically, shifting more of their spend into online channels than ever before. Yet for all of the buzz and bubble over online advertising the greater fact is that media companies are beginning to face the greatest challenge of all: disintermediation.Disintermediation is a word that has challenged publishers before, but it was a less important threat in the early days of the Web. Corporations were content at first to put out “brochureware” Web sites with little meaningful content and user’s interactions were limited to viewing pages and filling out forms for the most part.

But as corporations have learned to create and to sponsor their own engaging content and Web 2.0 technologies have encouraged users to write about and engage corporate content, things have changed quite a bit.

Advertising Age brings this together (registration/subscription) in an article that highlights some interesting statistics surfacing in recent online ratings data. Consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble Co., for example, does not have blockbuster Web sites by media ratings standards - P&G sites captured about 3.3 percent of ComScore’s U.S. October audience ratings - but by comparison this percentage is more than double it’s percentage share of overall U.S. ad spending and nine times its percentage of online ad spend share.

The AdAge article also points to McKinsey & Co. research that showed visitors to one corporate site generating $40 in corporate profit per visitor on average, compared with $5 for audiences reached by traditional media. Not only is going through intermediaries an expensive route through which to acquire customers, but one which doesn’t pay off as well in the end.

While content generated by media companies continues to engage audeinces it’s not clear that advertisers seeking return on their investment are going to follow suit endlessly with major brand-building campaigns. If markets are conversations, as The Cluetrain Manifesto once intimated, then media companies are having a much harder time figuring out why anyone should be chatting with them.

User-generated content is held out oftentimes as a way to help media companies to find a place in the chit-chat between sellers and buyers, but owning a user-generated media property is not synonymous with being able to engage in a conversation. Brand advertising is about seduction: conversations are about relationships. In the meantime the focus on user-generated content leaves fewer dollars to spend on traditional media products - further weakening their potential to appeal to audiences.

Are we witnessing the death of media? Well, yes, in an abstract sense.

There will always be advertising and there will always be companies willing to extend their conversations with their markets through media-based advertising. But if marketing is better served through more direct and focused communications with audiences and through multi-channel advertising wholesalers like Google, then traditional media companies have nowhere to go but down.

The conversations that drive media spends are shifting radically and rapidly and will continue to do so over the next several years. Here are a few ideas as to how media companies can keep abreast of these changes:

  • Polish your conversation skills.In spite of the influx of user-generated media services being adapted by media companies most are pretty “hands-off” when it comes to integrating user content with editorial sources. While traditional editorial content is still valuable it’s lack of integration with conversations found in user content is going to compromise its ability to attract premium ad dollars in the long run.If marketing is moving from a command-and-control economic model to a networked model then media needs to adjust its fundamental purpose from being a medium for advertising to being a gatherer of market participants exchanging views. It sounds simple enough, but making a conversational marketing model work in the long run is going to take a lot more skill than slapping banner ads on MySpace pages.
  • Move beyond your roots. Advertising at the very dawn of commercial radio was thought of - literally - as a phone booth in a studio which people would rent for a limited time to broadcast a message. Today that phone booth is online and interactive - much to the pleasure of advertisers, but also to the detriment of publishers who still struggle with their role.Media companies can continue to focus on renting out studio phone booths, but it’s a better bet to focus on providing content that marketers can contextualize as they please in their own “phone booths” and in contexts defined by their audiences - and to provide expertise and technology that will allow marketers to extend those conversations into deeper levels of engagement.
  • Rethink aggregation. For the vast majority of publishers aggregation is about gaining an edge by bringing together your own content or licensed content into one “walled garden” or another for advertisers or subscribers. But search technologies and services such as social bookmarking, feeds and web mining have make the ideal garden something that is much closer to the needs of individuals and institutions than the ambitions of publishers and aggregators.Marketing value is now maximized when content flows to the contexts that users desire most as efficiently as possible - rather than trying to corral them into contexts not conducive to marketing conversations.

With a near-infinite inventory of content and a finite inventory of advertisers, media companies are in a race with corporate marketers to come up with the most compelling content and context that can get a marketing message across to audiences.

In the long run this is a race that most media companies can only lose. It’s time for media companies to shift permanently to being enablers of effective conversations from all sources.

Today’s “media star” is no longer the one with the least common denominator gazing at them but the one who can get audiences and marketers looking at one another most effectively.

Google set to expand newspaper ad program

For some of the nation’s newspapers, Google’s offer was too good to pass up.

This fall, the search-engine company proposed to show how it could help newspapers sell print advertising to the hundreds of thousands of small merchants who buy Internet ads from Google. Advertisers would go online and bid on the excess ad inventory of daily newspapers, giving them a much-needed revenue boost.

Now, two months into a test with 100 advertisers and 66 newspapers, Google executives say that its pilot program has exceeded their expectations and that they will roll out an expanded version in the coming months. The top five participating newspapers are getting several bids a week from advertisers, the company said.

“The volume [of ads sold] is tripling where we thought it would be,” said Tom Phillips, director of print ads at Google. “I think we’ll have real impact next year” on newspapers’ bottom lines, he said. “We open the medium to a whole new class of advertisers.”

But to hear newspaper executives and analysts tell it, the outlook is more cautious. They said Google has brought in new advertisers, such as small companies outside their distribution areas looking to build more awareness for their products. But Google’s online ad technology is so new that it remains unclear how much it will help newspapers, they said.

Todd Haskell, vice president of business development at the New York Times Co., which is participating, said that the product has the potential to drum up new business from small advertisers but that the Times does not foresee letting go of its direct relationships with its largest advertisers.

“We think it’s a wonderful way to introduce advertisers to the New York Times and print overall,” Haskell said. Once the program gets going, he added, “we’d look to up-sell and migrate those [smaller advertisers] to bigger programs and better positions [in the paper] and move them out of the Google system. And we’ve been very upfront with Google about that.”

Google’s newspaper project is part of its larger effort to transform advertising in traditional media. The company has launched a similar test selling ads on dozens of radio stations across the country. It also has experimented with ad sales for magazines, though after a couple of unsuccessful tries, the company indicated that the program was on the back burner. Google is also interested in selling TV ads.

In some ways, what Google is trying to do is similar to what other ad brokers and agencies have done for years — buy unsold ad space in newspapers and resell it to last-minute buyers. In the newspaper experiment, for example, Google is selling only small display ads — not color or full-page ads, which bring in the most money. In some cases, Google bundles a few small ads into one larger space. There is no indication to the reader that Google helped place the ad.

What differentiates Google is its large network of online advertisers, many of which have never purchased a newspaper ad but will be able to soon with one click. Most newspapers’ ad sales teams have focused on their biggest and highest-paying customers in recent years, and Google’s experience suggests that small advertisers could prove valuable, too, if their volume is high enough.

“Newspapers have priced a lot of small advertisers out of the newspaper,” said John Morton, a newspaper industry analyst. Google’s plan “might be a way to bring them in,” he said. “But it’s early. We just don’t know how much or for sure whether it’s going to work.”

Google’s online system allows advertisers to choose the newspaper and the section, such as Food or Sports or Business, and where they want the ad to run, and then place a bid for that space for a particular day or series of days. The newspaper reviews the bids online and decides which, if any, to accept.

Ed Peterson, executive vice president of sales and marketing for Intelius, a Web company in Bellevue, Wash., said his firm is placing ads through the program and has been pleased with the results. The company, which offers background checks for companies and consumers, has grown its business primarily using online advertising with Google. It sees newspapers as a way to expand further.

“They’ve taken the print world and allowed us to manage it in an Internet way,” Peterson said. His firm is running several ads a week in the Seattle Times, the Chicago Tribune, the San Jose Mercury News and the New York Times. It is planning to run ads in The Washington Post, which also is participating.

The tricky part, he said, is that it has been a little more difficult to gauge the effectiveness of newspaper ads than Internet ads, which invite people to click on them. “The great thing about the online world is you know immediately” how effective your ad is, Peterson said. But since the newspaper ads have run, he said, Intelius’s call volume has gone up and its Web site visitors are buying more frequently. “For us, that points to effectiveness,” he said. “You can do some basic math, and you can point to: ‘I ran this ad in this region on this day, and how do our numbers look?’ — those kinds of things.”

Google’s test concludes at the end of January. After that, participating newspapers and Google will refine the program and decide how to go forward.

Owen Youngman, vice president of development at the Chicago Tribune, said Google’s experiment has brought several new advertisers to his newspaper, although a few other Tribune Co.-owned papers haven’t seen as much activity.

“We’ve been viewing it as a vehicle for small advertisers,” Youngman said, calling it “an interesting research and development project.”

For now, Google is taking no commission for brokering ad sales, though it intends to do so later. Such finer points of how a business relationship might work between newspapers and Google have yet to be worked out.

The participating newspapers and Google “have deferred the complicated negotiations,” Youngman said.

Google’s 2006 top searches

Google’s top searches show what defined 2006

Canadian PressTORONTO — Online social networks, Borat’s American invasion, Paris Hilton, and the definition of promiscuous were among the top subjects that people wanted to learn more about in 2006, according to Google’s annual list of top searches.

Google processes billions of searches each month and calls the results the zeitgeist — a “general intellectual, moral, and cultural climate of an era.”

Bebo and Myspace were the top two searches in 2006, showing the increasing popularity of social networks among young web surfers.

Alexa Internet, which tallies web hits and maintains a list of the most popular sites, says Myspace is the No. 5 site on the Internet — and the top ranked non-search engine — but competitor Bebo at No. 168 was the most popular Google search of the year.

Myspace has become an online hangout for young people to chat with friends and easily post blogs and music, and has also evolved into a marketing tool for celebrities and bands. Bebo is following in that mould and seems to be gaining ground, especially overseas.

The World Cup, which is the most-watched sporting event in the world, drew the third-most search results. With an estimated 5.9 billion viewers worldwide, the soccer tournament’s search numbers easily surpassed those of the Super Bowl, World Series and Olympics.

Surprisingly, video-sharing website YouTube didn’t make Google’s top 10 list, but a similar site, Metacafe, placed at No. 4. One of the site’s gimmicks is to pay users for original content that is viewed more than 20,000 times. The site says Toronto-based stunt team Real Stunts has earned $25,277 for a clip that’s been viewed more than five million times.

Rounding out the top 10 searches were radioblog, a web program that’s used to play music or sound on websites; Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia; the generic term video, which results in about 1.37 billion matches to sort through; Rebelde, a Mexican miniseries soap opera; Mininova, a search engine for downloading music, movies, TV shows and programs; and wiki, a term that refers to a collaborative website that can be edited by many users.

The top Google search term for news articles was Paris Hilton, who made headlines all year for a rift with former “The Simple Life” co-star Nicole Richie, the release of her self-titled debut CD, an arrest for allegedly driving under the influence, and for simply being Paris Hilton.

Orlando Bloom, cancer, podcasting, hurricane Katrina, bankruptcy, Martina Hingis, autism, the 2006 NFL draft and celebrity Big Brother 2006 made up the rest of the top 10 Google News searches.

Google also broke down some common questions posed by web surfers, and more than anyone else, people wanted to know “who is Borat?” The TV and movie character, played by British comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, was the star of the hit comedy “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.”

People were also curious about Hezbollah, Capote, Mohammed and Buckethead.

Web users asking for definitions were most curious about the word promiscuous, which perhaps had something to do with the hit song by Canadian songstress Nelly Furtado. Computer terms Ajax and Web 2.0, the acronym ftw, and harlequin were also often asked about, and the other five of the top 10 definition searches were for the Spanish words for administration, philosophy, quality, science and test.

Google users were also more curious about the wedding of Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban than the nuptials of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, showed more interest in the divorce of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills McCartney than the breakup of Britney Spears and Kevin Federline, and wanted to know most about the death of Aaron Spelling, followed by Kirby Puckett.

Google doesn’t compile a year in review for Canadian searches, but in November, Ebay was the top search term followed by Myspace, Wikipedia, Mapquest, Britney Spears, games, Nexopia, dictionary, facebook, 411, Runescape, Future Shop, Air Canada, Canadian Tire and video.

Google won’t release its search numbers, but according to Nielsen/NetRatings, it consistently garners just under half of the Internet’s web searches, and in November processed almost 3.1 billion searches — about 100 million a day, or 1,157 a second.

Online ad spending to outpace overall ad market growth

Internet advertising continues to gain on other ad categories.

ZenithOptimedia forecasts that global Internet advertising spending will grow by 28.2% in 2007, at the same time ad spending in other media will grow by only 3.9% — in other words, online ad spending will grow seven times faster.

This disparity speaks volumes about the ongoing seismic shift in the world of advertising. However, the shift to the Internet among US marketers is even more dramatic. eMarketer’s latest ad spending projections were released on Wednesday (see Internet Advertising Will Weather a Sluggish Economy). These put growth in US online ad spending at 18.9% in 2007, within an entire advertising industry set to grow by only 1.4%.

ZenithOptimedia also projects that the Internet’s share of world wide total ad spending will increase from 5.8% in 2006 to 8.6% in 2009.

The researcher’s data show worldwide spending on Internet advertising exceeding the amount spent outdoor advertising this year and surpassing even radio ad spending in 2009.

The analysts at ZenithOptimedia point out that the rise of Internet advertising has been dramatic. In terms of total ad spending, the Internet has overtaken two long-established media: cinema (which it overtook in 1997) and outdoor (which it overtook this year) in the space of only 11 years.

In addition, even in developed markets the Internet receives a much lower share of ad budgets than the amount of time consumers devote to it. ZenithOptimedia describes how, in 2005, consumers in the USA, Japan and the UK (the top three ad markets) spent 21.9% of their media time using the Internet, yet advertisers in those three markets spent only 6.8% of their budgets online.

ZenithOptimedia states: “We expect the Internet to take nearly 9% of global adspend by 2009, but experience from the most developed markets suggests it is heading for well over 10%. The Internet already attracts more than 10% of adspend in three markets (Norway, Sweden and the UK), and by 2009 we expect it to do so in ten markets (Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK and USA). The Internet has its highest share in the UK, where it will attract 13.5% of adspend this year and 21.5% in 2009.”

Looking at the breakdown of online advertising, the researchers found that paid search is the largest single type of Internet advertising, and the gap between search and display ads is widening. However, display includes video ads and other innovations that are exploiting the creative opportunities offered by high-speed broadband, and still has growth potential. Meanwhile, classified continues to migrate from print to online.

For another look into the future, read eMarketer’s US Online Ad Spending: Peak of Plateau? report.

Online ad spending to outpace overall ad market growth

Internet advertising continues to gain on other ad categories.

ZenithOptimedia forecasts that global Internet advertising spending will grow by 28.2% in 2007, at the same time ad spending in other media will grow by only 3.9% — in other words, online ad spending will grow seven times faster.

This disparity speaks volumes about the ongoing seismic shift in the world of advertising. However, the shift to the Internet among US marketers is even more dramatic. eMarketer’s latest ad spending projections were released on Wednesday (see Internet Advertising Will Weather a Sluggish Economy). These put growth in US online ad spending at 18.9% in 2007, within an entire advertising industry set to grow by only 1.4%.

ZenithOptimedia also projects that the Internet’s share of world wide total ad spending will increase from 5.8% in 2006 to 8.6% in 2009.

The researcher’s data show worldwide spending on Internet advertising exceeding the amount spent outdoor advertising this year and surpassing even radio ad spending in 2009.

The analysts at ZenithOptimedia point out that the rise of Internet advertising has been dramatic. In terms of total ad spending, the Internet has overtaken two long-established media: cinema (which it overtook in 1997) and outdoor (which it overtook this year) in the space of only 11 years.

In addition, even in developed markets the Internet receives a much lower share of ad budgets than the amount of time consumers devote to it. ZenithOptimedia describes how, in 2005, consumers in the USA, Japan and the UK (the top three ad markets) spent 21.9% of their media time using the Internet, yet advertisers in those three markets spent only 6.8% of their budgets online.

ZenithOptimedia states: “We expect the Internet to take nearly 9% of global adspend by 2009, but experience from the most developed markets suggests it is heading for well over 10%. The Internet already attracts more than 10% of adspend in three markets (Norway, Sweden and the UK), and by 2009 we expect it to do so in ten markets (Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK and USA). The Internet has its highest share in the UK, where it will attract 13.5% of adspend this year and 21.5% in 2009.”

Looking at the breakdown of online advertising, the researchers found that paid search is the largest single type of Internet advertising, and the gap between search and display ads is widening. However, display includes video ads and other innovations that are exploiting the creative opportunities offered by high-speed broadband, and still has growth potential. Meanwhile, classified continues to migrate from print to online.

For another look into the future, read eMarketer’s US Online Ad Spending: Peak of Plateau? report.

Canadians spend over 45 billion minutes online in September —

Dec. 7, 2006, TORONTO - According to comScore Media Metrix, over 22 million Canadians use the Internet every month. For Canadians, the Internet has become an irreplaceable medium for both business and consumer communication, networking, research and product purchase. In the last year alone, the number of people Online in Canada has grown by 14 percent.

Not surprisingly, advertisers are following the consumer and dedicating more of their advertising budgets to Interactive media. In fact, the IAB has estimated that in 2006, Canadian Online Advertising Revenue will top $800 million dollars.

On behalf of an Interactive industry that is currently enjoying prosperity — but which certainly has seen, and been through rough times — IAB Canada agreed to provide Canada’s National Advertising Benevolent Society (NABS), with $250, for every billion minutes spent Online in the month of September 2006.

Historically, between 37-38 billion minutes have been spent Online by Canadians at this time of the year. IAB Canada is pleased to announce that the actual number for time spent Online by Canadians in September 2006 (one of the three highest months of the year), was a whopping 45,776* billion minutes! As a result, IAB Canada will be writing a cheque for $11,444.00 to NABS.

“This is a good news story for everybody,” says Paula Gignac, President of IAB Canada. “It’s proof again, that the Internet continues to be of paramount importance for all sorts of day-to-day activities, for all sorts of Canadian age groups and consumer cohorts. And, as the 2006 September number is a full 20 percent bigger than 2005 estimates, it’s also proof that consumers’ passion for the medium has not waned, and that the Internet still has loads of untapped potential for advertisers. Finally, we’re extremely happy to tie this growth to a donation to NABS, in order to keep the industry that develops creative for, produces, plans, buys and sells the medium, healthy as well.”

“It’s great to see IAB Canada taking a leadership position by supporting industry colleagues, while highlighting the growing importance of Online advertising,” says Mike Fenton, President and CEO of NABS Canada. “Thanks to all IAB members and the Association, who will be recognized in our ‘Friends of NABS’ donor recognition program for this financial support.”

*Verified by comScore Media Metrix Canada, and represents the time spent for All Canadians in the All Locations Database for Sept. 2006.